 |
 |
|
 |
Outer Shield The comprehensive plan may seem more
feasible than the total shield, but there are reasons to consider
enclosing the significant tracts of marsh that the other plans would
leave exposed to the sea. The marshes provide wintering grounds for
70 percent of the nation's migratory waterfowl, cushion ocean waves
that could otherwise disturb shallow underground pipelines, and
could partially absorb rising sea levels. The region could be walled
in by connecting the barrier islands with dams and long stretches of
gates--the option the Netherlands embraced after a horrific 1953
storm generated a 15-foot surge that killed 1,800 people and flooded
800 square miles. Virtually the entire country is delta; 26 percent
of it is below sea level, bottoming out at -22 feet, lower than New
Orleans. The surface is subsiding, too, accelerated by extraction of
freshwater and peat, and is home to several major lakes and river
outlets. Today the nation is outlined by more than 1,000 miles of
dikes (levees), dunes, dams and gates--far longer than the line
needed around Louisiana.
Joop Weijers, a longtime senior engineer at the Dutch Ministry of
Transport, Public Works and Water Management, which oversees the
Delta Works network, says a similar approach could protect Louisiana
and deltas in other nations. Although the Netherlands's shield may
seem grandiose, Weijers says "building the whole system right now
would cost $15 billion to $16 billion." Maintenance runs about $500
million a year. But after the coast was secured, he adds, "the
region got an economic boost in tourism, farming and industry."
|
 |
| ADVERTISEMENT (article
continues below) |
|
|
 | |
| Coastal administrator Len Bahr says an outer shield
is a wild idea, but given the delta's alarming deterioration, "we
may need some wild new ideas." Williams of the USGS concurs:
"Considering the rates of sea-level rise, land subsidence, and the
increasing frequency and severity of storms, it's a legitimate
option."
Take a Scientist to Lunch Panicked by the devastation
in 1953, the Dutch quickly set out to build solid dams across
several wide estuaries to the North Sea. Those berms, however, cut
off the interchange of saltwater and freshwater and altered the
environment. In recent decades, Delta Works has changed direction,
emphasizing man-made barriers that close only when surges are
imminent. "It took us a long time to learn that we could work with
nature, not just defy it," Weijers says. He advises U.S. planners to
"really think it through."
|
| Wagonaar at the Corps, Malbrough at Shaw Coastal, and
Mashriqui at L.S.U. agree that certain aspects of the original Coast
2050 and LCA plans that would revive the marshes must be
incorporated into any plan adopted. Diversions--large doorways
inserted into the levee along the Mississippi River's banks--would
supply freshwater and sediment to the wetlands. The Corps' plan
includes a significant number of gates to "let water flow in and out
to support the LCA objectives," Wagonaar says.
Although the Netherlands and Britain probably have much advice to
offer, Malbrough says, "we don't need the Dutch to tell us how to
build a levee system." The Corps apparently felt that way at one
time, too; its officials made similar statements to Scientific
American during research for a 2001 article about restoring the
delta [see "More to Explore" below]. But collaboration may improve.
In 2004 the Corps and Delta Works leaders signed a memo of
understanding to exchange information, and in October several Dutch
engineers helped the Corps analyze New Orleans's flood-wall
failures.
The need to coordinate physical protection across levee districts
and to incorporate coastal restoration means a clear leader is
needed. The experts interviewed for this article acknowledged that
political infighting in Louisiana killed smaller proposals in the
past. Malbrough hopes this message may be sinking in; he was hired
by various levee boards together to present the state and federal
government with one coordinated plan. Both he, Mashriqui and Bahr
think a federally run consortium should oversee the work. They
oppose putting the Corps in charge, seeing it as too slow, too
politicized by Congress, and too unwilling to entertain novel
technical approaches. "I'm inclined to change horses," Mashriqui
says. |
|
|
 |
 |
 |
|
|
 |
 | |
 |
 |
 |
|